Searching for the Source

While many nations, tribes, and spiritual leaders argue of who and what the source was or is, it is quite likely that when the truth is revealed in the end, all will find they are both right and wrong in their theories. The source of all that is and all that is not was created from and within itself. Its creations are tangible and intangible. Its knowledge of self is from itself. Contrary to all of humankind's belief, this source was of nothingness and everything and from this came a balance of twelve columns of existence, also known as the Elders. Each column possesses an intricate element for everything and nothing to exist or not exist in one way or another. One of the columns of the source is known as Time. Believe it or not, time was created before the God that is believed to have created the Universe. Again explaining why God cannot manipulate it or rewind it for personal gain or purpose. Time is an elemental column of pure existence and will not be diluted, changed or switched.
-DeMaster Thomas

 There are no limits to the incomprehensible multi-verses as you have come to know them. 

Truth: Time gave birth to a creator. Truth: Creator gave birth to a metaphysical being. 

Truth: Metaphysical  being gave birth to the homo sapien. Truth: Metaphysical being walks among the homo sapien and gives eternal life to its past, present and future. Truth: There is life after physical death. The purpose: So that you may know experientially only what you first knew conceptually.

The search for the source was a dream. A concept. Today, we argue over the existence of Jesus Christ only to find he was none of the things most believed he was. He explained very clearly that he was not of this world and not bound by any race, creed, color, religion or political system. He is the occult: not a cult. This is another area where humans got it wrong a long time ago. Because of the lack of understanding of existence and how it works, legalism, socialism and faulted belief systems rule our culture, rule our world, and worst of all, rule our way of thinking and comprehending truth. There is only a purpose and need for one begotten Son. There is only a purpose and need for one life and one death. But for our feeble little hearts and extremely confused minds, this is simply not enough. We as a unique species: beg for more. So I call on the source for more than knowledge; I am asking for wisdom. (DeMaster Thomas)

The search for the source started in Africa, led to Mexico, and points to Alaska. The truth awaits. Sleep now.

-DeMaster Thomas

How to Stop Time

Einstein demonstrated that time is relative.

But the rabbit-hole goes much deeper. Quantum physics discovered that consciousness is entangled in matter in some inexplicable ways; but other than the very fast, or very small, or very large, we tend to assume our “ordinary” reality conforms more to the laws of Newton. Simple cause and effect unfolding with clockwork constancy —well, it’s time to shatter this assumption. Let’s stop time.

Find a clock with a smooth sweeping second hand. The one on the link below will work, but depending on how much is running on your computer, it may or may not be completely smooth. If it appears relatively smooth, it will still work, you’ll be able to factor out what you are controlling. After watching the second hand for a bit, look off to the side of the clock, outside of the box, and about 15 to 20 minutes ahead of the second hand. You should still be able to see the second hand, but you won’t be looking directly at it. Now just relax and see if you can stop the second hand. If it starts catching up to the point you are looking at, jump ahead to another spot about 20 minutes ahead. With very little practice you are extremely likely to make a most remarkable discovery. You can stop time. Perhaps at first for only a second or two, but with practice, you’ll be able to freeze it for longer. If you can’t get it right away, try playing with your focus point, move it further away or closer to the frame of the clock. Or look at one of the hour markers on the clock about 20 to 30 minutes ahead. After you get it, try counting internally. The count you reach is the number of discrete thought processes you performed in zero clock time.

Once you’ve accomplished this amazing feat, what does it mean? Some people think it’s just a simple optical illusion, that they merely stopped seeing the second hand which was actually still moving (which gets entertaining with banishing incantations of blind spots, foveal vision, saccades and such.) But if they ask themselves why it started moving again from the point it stopped (and most won’t), their explanation doesn’t quite pan out. Some will just dismiss it as a curious blip that doesn’t really fit into their radar about “reality” and it won’t be cause for further concern. But a few of us will notice the crack between experience and beliefs and want to play. Does it stop sound at the same time? For some people, for others not, which is curiouser still. Maybe consciousness can be more than a passive observer of this “constant” called time?

-DeMaster Thomas

CLICK HERE

Put it to the Test

Time is and of itself is a constant element. It cannot be manipulated. The pure essence of time cannot be diluted, changed or switched. Ergo there is no way to "undo" something that has already been done. If a concept has become reality, there is no way to turn back time to reverse the creation of the reality back to just an idea. The reality is permanent and part of the infinite. Only the actual act of time itself can remedy the effects of reality. In other words, A caused B to happen. But Time caused C to happen, which makes the most of whatever B was. Case in point. The death of a loved one. A car accident. A graduation from school. Getting pregnant. Going out on a date with friends. A winning team at a football game. Events take place. The outcome of those events can never be "undone". However, time can alter the individual reaction to the event. But the event cannot alter time. Fine. We as a natural being accept this is the way of the workings of the universe and until science fiction becomes science fact - we will - for now, believe there is no way to "go back" in time and change the outcome of an event to suit the future pattern of existence. After all, if that were the case, no one in natural reality would ever make it past the next living and waking hour of the day. There would always be someone somewhere every hour of the day, rewinding the clock for their own personal gain. God forbid (pun intended) we learn nothing from "The Butterfly Effect."

Standard Home use-Night Camera

 But there is no law of the natural world that says we cannot record it. So. Put it to the test. There is suggestion that time in-and-of itself is doing its own alterations in the permanent history vault of existence. We see examples of this all the time in movies and television shows. One really good example is in the movie, "The Matrix" where there is a scene that mentions Deja Vu is a glitch in the Matrix itself-a snag in the programming. It is not supposed to be seen by the average naked eye. It is supposed to happen without being noticed so that you as a cognitive being go on about your way without detection that things are being altered around you. But the human mind records everything it experiences. You may not know it, but your entire life is being recorded on the greatest microchip and hard drive known to humankind-the brain. And the brain remembers things far differently than you do. So when something happens in the world and you go back and remember it but its supposed to be the first time its happened, the mind is not stupid. It's just letting you know that "time" made a small subtle change or turn in the pattern of events. Now, it's important to remember that again, time is a constant element. Time cannot be altered in any way. Otherwise, the creator could just "go back" in time and say there was no battle in heaven and erase the existence of a fallen being that brought corrupted knowledge to the humans which shaped and molded the world we live in today. It would have never happened. "Sin" would not exist. There would be no point for anything if all you had to do was press the "easy" button and go back and erase whatever just happened. No one would ever have a bad day anymore. No death. No sin. No accidents. I think I made my point. Back to the test. 

To accurately record the change in your time in comparison to the universal time, take a standard stop watch battery powered, a regular clock or cell phone clock or wrist watch, any will do, and set up a night cam in your room or where you sleep. What you will find may astound you. Before you go to sleep, confirm all the times are in sync. When you wake in the morning for the first time, check the times again, if you are able, lay down and go back to sleep for at least another hour or two. When you wake, you will find that your night cam has recorded you sleeping while the world was changing around you. Your time on your stop watch and your regular clock, cell phone, etc., will not be the same time. They should actually be off precisely the exact amount of time you fell back to sleep. If you slept for another hour, the times should differ by one hour. If you slept for another 2 hours, the time will differ by that amount. Now the question is does this really work? I suppose you will have to try it to find out. Good luck. See you in your dreams.

-DeMaster Thomas

Can you hear me now...Good

Fore the mouths of fools will speak death into reality

John Lennon (Singer):

Some years before, during his interview with an American Magazine, he said:

"Christianity will end, it will disappear. I do not have to argue about that. I am certain. Jesus was okay, but his subjects were too simple. Today we are more famous than Him" (1966).

Lennon, after saying that the Beatles were more famous than Jesus Christ, was shot six times.

Tancredo Neves (President of Brazil):

During the Presidential campaign, he said if he got 500,000 votes from his party, not even God would remove him from Presidency.


Sure he got the votes, but he got sick a day before being made President, then he died.

Cazuza (Bi-sexual Brazilian composer, singer and poet):

During A show in Canecio ( Rio De Janeiro), while smoking his cigar, he puffed out some smoke into the air and said: "God, that's for you."

He died at the age of 32 of AIDS in a horrible manner.

Thomas Andrews (the man who built the Titanic):

After the construction of Titanic, a reporter asked him how safe the Titanic would be.

With an ironic tone he said: "Not even God can sink it"

The result: Iceberg-straight ahead.

Norma-Jeane Mortenson (Actress):

She was visited by Billy Graham during a presentation at a show. He said the Spirit of God had sent him to preach to her. After hearing what the Preacher had to say, she said: "I don't need your Jesus".

A week later, she was found dead in the bedroom of her Brentwood home.

Bon Scott (Singer):

The ex-vocalist of the AC/DC. On one of his 1979 songs he sang:

"Don't stop me, I'm going down all the way, down the highway to hell".

On the 19th of February 1980, Bon Scott was found dead from choking on his own vomit.

Campinas 2005:

 

In Campinas, Brazil a group of friends, drunk, went to pick up a friend. The mother accompanied her to the car and was so worried about the drunkenness of her friends and she said to the daughter holding her hand, who was already seated in the car:

"My Daughter, Go With God And May He Protect You.."

She responded: "Only if He (God) travels in the trunk, cause inside here, it's already full."

Hours later, news came by that they had been involved in a fatal accident, everyone had died,

the car could not be recognized what type of car it had been, but surprisingly, the trunk was intact.

The police said there was no way the trunk could have remained intact. To their surprise, inside the trunk was a crate of eggs, none were broken .

Christine Hewitt (Jamaican Journalist and entertainer):

Said that the Bible (Word of God) was the worst book ever written.

In June 2006 she was found burnt beyond recognition in her motor vehicle .

This is a popular post on the Internet and while it may be mainly an argument for the spiritual or religious, it really feeds the curiosity to question, is there more beyond what we see? Is there more beyond what we think? And more importantly, is there more beyond life than what we imagine? 

I think another great line from pop-culture is from the film, A Few Good Men, we all know it, "He is dead because he had no honor. And God was watching." Can we literally speak life and death into reality? Thinking deeper, can we dream about someone living or dying and bring that upon them? If so, then the same is true for things a bit more positive such as love, money and career. After all, there is another popular study out there called the law of attraction. Either way, it starts with the thought, it is given fuel by the word and then engulfed into flames by the action. This is how creation works. From concept to reality. Beginning to end.

-DeMaster Thomas

God's Calling-it's for You

So, how can we know if a dream about an angel is a real angelic appearance?

Here are some guidelines I have developed as a result of my study of the Bible, my postgraduate work in dreams at the Yale Divinity School, and my talks with people about their experiences.

1. The result of the dream will draw attention to God more than the angel. Angels are God’s messengers and their purpose is always to bring glory to God, not to themselves.
2. The dreams usually leave a person with feelings of awe and wonder and that God is loving. This is true even when the angel appears to a person who is rebelling against God and is deep in sin. The angel may appear to judge and to scare a person straight. Often, when this occurs, the angel does not even give a message in words, but the experience of God’s presence is shattering and life-transforming and points to a God who cares deeply.
3. Is this dream sensible or illogical? We need to use common sense. While a dream or a vision may come from God and be a positive life-changing event, the dream may also come from images buried in our subconscious. God does not send his angels to tell us silly or terrible things. It is always wise to share your experience with a trusted member of your faith community. Sharing with another person helps us evaluate the authenticity of what may be an angelic encounter.
4. Does this dream contradict what is taught in the Bible? God does not contradict himself. See my past column: Good Angels, Bad Angels.
5. Does this encounter leave you more renewed and more resolved to serve God? If is the encounter is genuine it will move you to love God more deeply and to live out your faith more consistently.

Bill Webber at
angelquestions@beliefnetstaff.com

Perspective

Derek Speed wrote: (2008)

Man will destroy this planet long before any "death star" will. Pay attention,  firstly it has been proven in a Supreme Court in the United States that there is no such thing as intelligent design by "god". Secondly, it will be the philosophies of religion that destroy the earth. Two thousand years ago, someone named Moses wrote what's called the Ten Commandments, one of those Commandments was "Thou Shalt not Kill". That philosophy makes human life, more valuable than the planet that sustains it. According to experts, there was 1 billion people on this planet two thousand years ago. If no humans killed any humans for the last two thousand years like the bible suggest, what would the current human population of this planet be right now? Keep in mind, the human population has doubled in the last forty years from 3 billion to 6 billion. Take out a pencil and piece of paper, now draw a circle, with another circle around the outside of the circle you just drew. Make it look like a cell and a nucleus. Now think of how a virus works, a virus or parasite like the Ebola Virus. If one of these parasites invade one of our cells, it will do nothing but consume and reproduce, just like the human animal in the "thou shalt not kill" world. Think of planet earth as a cell in our bodies, the earth is the atom and the ozone is the nucleus that protects it. The human animal does nothing but consume and reproduce, because we are not permitted to kill or conflict with each other, it's against "gods" law.
What happens to a cell when its totally consumed by a virus or a parasite, well, it dies. We the human race in the "thou shalt not kill" world will kill our cell or planet. I want you to think of those four words uttered 2 thousand years ago, and then go pick up a dictionary and look up the word Ironic. Why is everything round, bubbles, the earth, the atom, our cells, even our orbit, well it's simple really, the circle is the most efficient shape, the circle of life doesn't start at ocean plankton and end at the lion. We, the human race walk this planet with infinite complacency, convinced of our superiority over it, that way of thinking is going to get us all killed.

The End of the Earth

 End of the Earth Postponed

By Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer
posted: 18 October 2010 06:06 pm ET

Buzz up!

del.icio.us

Digg It!

Newsvine

reddit

It's a good news/bad news situation for believers in the 2012 Mayan apocalypse. The good news is that the Mayan "Long Count" calendar may not end on Dec. 21, 2012 (and, by extension, the world may not end along with it). The bad news for prophecy believers? If the calendar doesn't end in December 2012, no one knows when it actually will — or if it has already. A new critique, published as a chapter in the new textbook "Calendars and Years II: Astronomy and Time in the Ancient and Medieval World" (Oxbow Books, 2010), argues that the accepted conversions of dates from Mayan to the modern calendar may be off by as much as 50 or 100 years. That would throw the supposed and overhyped 2012 apocalypse off by decades and cast into doubt the dates of historical Mayan events. (The doomsday worries are based on the fact that the Mayan calendar ends in 2012, much as our year ends on Dec. 31.)

The Mayan calendar was converted to today's Gregorian calendar using a calculation called the GMT constant, named for the last initials of three early Mayanist researchers. Much of the work emphasized dates recovered from colonial documents that were written in the Mayan language in the Latin alphabet, according to the chapter's author, Gerardo Aldana, University of California, Santa Barbara professor of Chicana and Chicano Studies.

Later, the GMT constant was bolstered by American linguist and anthropologist Floyd Lounsbury, who used data in the Dresden Codex Venus Table, a Mayan calendar and almanac that charts dates relative to the movements of Venus. "He took the position that his work removed the last obstacle to fully accepting the GMT constant," Aldana said in a statement. "Others took his work even further, suggesting that he had proven the GMT constant to be correct."

But according to Aldana, Lounsbury's evidence is far from irrefutable. "If the Venus Table cannot be used to prove the GMT as Lounsbury suggests, its acceptance depends on the reliability of the corroborating data," he said. That historical data, he said, is less reliable than the Table itself, causing the argument for the GMT constant to fall "like a stack of cards." Aldana doesn't have any answers as to what the correct calendar conversion might be, preferring to focus on why the current interpretation may be wrong. Looks like end-of-the-world theorists may need to find another ancient calendar on which to pin their apocalyptic hopes.